brooks-debt
ارزیابی و اولویتبندی بدهی فنی برای نقشهٔ راه refactor
این اسکیل مشکلات نگهداشتپذیری را شناسایی، دستهبندی و اولویتبندی میکند و به تیم کمک میکند نقشهٔ راه refactor بسازد. مبنای آن دوازده کتاب کلاسیک مهندسی است.
چه چیزی میگیرید
- شناسایی بدهی فنی
- دستهبندی و اولویتبندی
- نقشهٔ راه refactor
برای چه کاری خوب است
- برنامهریزی کاهش بدهی فنی
- توجیه refactor برای مدیران
برای چه کاری نیست
- پروژههای تازه شروعشده
دربارهٔ این اسکیل
Brooks-Lint — Tech Debt Assessment
When to Use
Use this skill when you need tech debt assessment that identifies, classifies, and prioritizes maintainability problems — helping teams build a refactoring roadmap — drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user asks about tech debt, refactoring priorities, what to clean up first, or asks "why...
Setup
- If available in an explicitly supplied upstream installation, read
../_shared/common.mdfor the Iron Law, Project Config, Report Template, and Health Score rules - Read
../_shared/source-coverage.mdfor book-level coverage, exceptions, and tradeoffs - Read
../_shared/decay-risks.mdfor symptom definitions and source attributions - Read
debt-guide.mdin this directory for the debt classification framework
Process
If the user has not described the codebase or pointed to specific areas: apply Auto
Scope Detection from ../_shared/common.md to determine the assessment scope before proceeding.
- Scan for all six decay risks (Step 1 of the guide); list every finding before scoring
- Apply the Pain × Spread priority formula and classify debt intent (Steps 2–3 of the guide)
- Group findings by decay risk (Step 4 of the guide)
- Output using the Report Template from common.md, plus the Debt Summary Table
Mode line in report: Tech Debt Assessment
Limitations
- Use this skill only when the task clearly matches its upstream source and local project context.
- Verify commands, generated code, dependencies, credentials, and external service behavior before applying changes.
- Do not treat examples as a substitute for environment-specific tests, security review, or user approval for destructive or costly actions.
Standalone catalog fallback
The ../_shared/* files referenced above are not bundled in this catalog. Do not claim their score, report or source-coverage rules were followed. The bundled debt guide can be used independently: define the authorized scope, record each symptom with current file/line evidence, its observed consequence and proposed remedy, then label Pain × Spread as a local prioritization heuristic. Unknown team intent stays unknown; missing documentation does not prove a shortcut was accidental. Report reviewed and unreviewed areas explicitly.